CFCU Community Credit Union v. Hayward (Scribner as trustee); WDNY Bk07-4369bk; 552 F.3d 253; Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision January 9, 2009: The NY homestead exemption was increased from $10,000 to $50,000 in August 2005, and the Haywards filed Chapter 7 shortly thereafter. CFCU, by Attorney Edward Crossmore, argued that the $40,000 increase should only apply to debts incurred after the law went into effect. The WDNY, EDNY, and NDNY bankruptcy courts disagreed, as did the District Court in WDNY and NDNY. CFCU appealed to the Second Circuit. Held: as an interpretation of New York law, the increase in the homestead was retroactive to debts incurred before the law was modified. Specific holdings: 1) The Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution (forbidding the impairment of contracts) was not infringed. The change did not substantially impair the contractual expectations of the parties, and even if it did, the changes was constitutionally justified as furthering a “significant and legitimate public purpose.” 2) Other than the Commerce Clause issue, this was a matter of New York law interpretation, not federal law interpretation. The Supreme Court decision in Owen v. Owen did not apply. Owen was a Florida case where a creditor obtained a judgment against the debtor’s condo, Florida then changed its exemption laws to include condos as homesteads but the change specifically excluded pre-change judgment liens; the debtor then filed bankruptcy and sought to avoid the judicial lien. The Supreme Court allowed the judgment to be avoided because the property being exempted – the condo – was exempt property and Florida’s limitation on that exemption – excluding older judgments – did not carry into bankruptcy. Somehow the Hayward court concluded that “Owen holds no sway here.” 3) Under New York law remedial legislation can apply retroactively and the legislative history here, especially the sponsoring legislator’s memorandum, indicated that the legislature intended that the change would be retroactive.
Second Circuit Decision: 2005 New York State Homestead exemption increase retroactive: Hayward
- Home |
- Recent Cases in the Bankruptcy Court Western District of New York | Second Circuit Decision: 2005 New York State Homestead exemption increase retroactive: Hayward
Second Circuit Decision: 2005 New York State Homestead exemption increase retroactive: Hayward
On Behalf of Peter R. Scribner, Esq. | Nov 16, 2009 | Recent Cases in the Bankruptcy Court Western District of New York
Recent Posts
Archives
- December 2021
- October 2021
- August 2021
- June 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- March 2019
- February 2019
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- January 2017
- October 2015
- June 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- June 2013
- March 2013
- September 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
Categories
- Bankruptcy
- Blog
- Casenotes: 2007 WDNY Bankruptcy Cases
- Casenotes: 2008 WDNY Bankruptcy Cases
- Casenotes: 2009 WDNY Bankruptcy Cases
- Casenotes: 2010 WDNY Bankruptcy Cases
- Casenotes: 2011 WDNY Bankruptcy Cases
- Casenotes: 2013 WDNY Bankruptcy Cases
- Casenotes: 2015 WDNY Bankruptcy Cases
- Firm News
- Legislation and Rules Updates
- Mortgages and Mortgage Foreclosures
- News from the Western District of New York Bankruptcy Court
- Notes from BAPCPA
- Notes on Bankruptcy cases outside WDNY
- Q&A: Bankruptcy Questions from the public
- Recent Cases in the Bankruptcy Court Western District of New York
- Statistical Trends in WDNY Bankruptcies
- Supreme Court Bankruptcy Cases